TL494 - magic chip, Part 6

While testing this device, do not overload, do not load asymmetrically. For checking your system, remove nixie and load secondary winding of transformer with simple resistor.

Some oscillograms

Download small (~500kb XVid AVI): with oscillograms. And now take a note, that on the “drain" oscillogram you see other phase pulses. Even when mosfet if in off stage, the induction from other primary winding cause voltage to appear. This may kill mosfet. And if load is unbalanced or not ideal, you can find lots of parasitic oscillations. So design engineer must take care of them. Parasitic oscillations can be killed with “snublers"- simple RC network on transformer windings. This devices takes some of the high frequency power and dissipates it.

And now lets look in internet:

 
Half-bridge and full-bridge

Push-pull

Forward converter

minimum mosfet voltage rating
supply voltage plus a safety margin

230VAC*1,414 + 50V
=> 400V mosfets

double
the supply voltage plus a large safety margin

2*230VAC*1,414+100V
=> 800V mosfets

double
the supply voltage plus a large safety margin

2*230VAC*1,414+100V
=> 800V mosfets


other mosfet properties
medium
voltage 400V fets, so a <0.2 Ohm channel resistance is typical =>
high current, low loss
high
voltage 800V fets, >2.0 Ohm channel resistance is typical => low
current, high loss
high
voltage 800V fets, >2.0 Ohm channel resistance is typical => low
current, high loss

mosfet body diode:
must
be disabled, otherwise mosfets explode

if supply <50VDC:
one reverse schottky in parallel is ok

if supply >50VDC:
more complicated - one series low voltage high current schottky, one
parallel high voltage ultrafast recovery diode (<250ns)

can
be ignored
can
be ignored

realistic power levels
many
kW
some
100W
some
100W

what limits the power level
base-feed
transformer core power handling capability (saturation, induced currents
causing core heating)

mosfet current ratings (paralleling more than two fets, the right way,
is tricky)

mosfet switching and conduction losses

primary
leakage inductance, huge voltage spikes (up to kV range) at increasing
power levels, makes use of snubber circuits imperative (=>high heating
losses and low efficiency, and high circuit complexity)

>=800V fets are expensive and can't handle much current

(same
as for push-pull)

transformer design
needs
only one primary

transformer design non-critical

needs
two identical and well coupled primaries, critical design - requires
skills! ;o)
critical
design, only one primary

only the first quadrant of the ferrite cores' B-H curve is used, i.e.
"transformer core running at only half of what it could handle".


base feed transformer volt-seconds (Vs) imbalance:
full-bridge:
minimal danger of saturation, Vs imbalance mainly due to slight differences
in mosfet channel on-resistances

half-bridge: if the primary has a series coupling capacitor, then Vs
imbalance is no big problem

major
problems with Vs imbalance as fully identical pri windings are almost
impossible to make. The driver circuit absolutely must have pulse-by-pulse
current limiting.
 

tuneable down to DC / 0Hz
yes,
by using a primary series coupling capacitor
no
(short-circuit at 0 Hz)
no
(short-circuit at freq towards 0 Hz)

problems
grief
with gate drive transformers or floating channel mosfet driver ICs or
optocoupler-tweaking
grief
with mosfets constantly dying on overvoltage, gate drive noise
(same
as for push-pull)

2 Responses to “TL494 - magic chip, Part 6”

  1. Savel brain dump in English! » Blog Archive » TL494 - magic chip, Part 5 Says:

    […] Savel brain dump in English! Same chaos as in my room « TL494 - magic chip, Part 4 TL494 - magic chip, Part 6 » […]

  2. Savel brain dump » Blog Archive » TL494 - universali mikroschema, 5 dalis Says:

    […] Sekanti pamokėlė […]

Leave a Reply

Bot-Check


Hey.lt - Interneto reitingai, lankomumo statistika, lankytojų skaitliukai

Place for rent.